Trump’s EPA just made the case against the Big Beautiful Bill

In last year’s campaign, Donald Trump frequently criticized the Biden administration for new regulations aimed at what he called “clean and beautiful coal.” In April, the signed executive orders ordered by federal agencies to get rid of any regulation that “discriminates” against coal. Coal power plants produce significant but reduced participation in American electricity, to 16 percent in 2023, and are, with much, the most polluting and planet heater component of the electricity sector in a Pilowatt basic.

So it was no surprise when, On Wednesday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin Gathered More than A Half -Box Republican Lawmakers at The Agency’s Washington, DC, Headquarters to AnnoununcE The Planned Repeal of Two Rules, Thatted Catered and Bides Administration, Thatted and BIDES BIDES BIDES, BIDES BIDES, BIDES BIDES, BIDES BIDES, BIDES BIDES, BIDES BIDES AND BIDES, BIDES BIDES, AND BIDES BIDES AND BIDES BIDES AND BIDES, AND BIDES BIDES, AND BIDES BIDES AND BIDES BIDES AND BIDES BIDES. Of us the power plants. Once finished, the proposals of Trump’s administrations will eliminate all the limits of Greenhouse gases Of plants and revokes the limit of mercury to a less strict standard of 2012, respectively.

The rules of the Biden era, rarin said on Wednesday, were “expectations, unreasonable and heavy” to make all kinds of industries, including coal and more, disappear. “With the demand for electricity prepared to increase in the coming years, especially as technological companies make massive investments in artificial intelligence infrastructure, Rarin said that the new proposals of the EPA will increase of electricity and “will make the United States the world capital of AI.”

His argument was resonated by the list of Republican legislators who followed him on the podium. The old rules “would have forced our most efficient and reliable energy generation of early retire From this, “added the representation of the Bresnhehan or the manufacturing or basis of manufacturing or the fact that the fact is more of this. Pennsylvania.

But despite its vigorous completion that as many energy sources are needed as possible to boost the future of the United States and maintain affordable public services invoices, each representative who spoke in a cross, only week, Allier was a great beer Allier certainly has the opposite effect. Analysts say that the pending legislet, which has the title inspired by Trump “One Big Beautiful Bill Law”, will decelerate the construction of the country of new sources of electricity and lead the average costs annual annual retention of annual energy retention of dollars.

This is because the new legislation of the Republican Party essentially repeals the Law on Inflation Reduction, a 2022 historical law that has resulted in approximately $ 800 billion in investments in clean energy technologies. By reliving regulations on coal power, the hope of the Republican party seems to be that some of those lost energy investments can be compensated by fossil fuels. However, analysts agree that this is very unlikely, largely due to the great cost of the new coal power, as well as supply bottlenecks that have strongly limited the viability of new gas plants. Instead, the result will probably be a more exensive electricity.

“The economy of coal plants is the sausage that always,” said Robbie Orvis, senior director of Modeling and Analysis in Energy Innovation, a group of non -partisan experts. “Just keeping existing coal plants online compared to the construction of new renewable energies is more expense.”

For the revocation of the rule of greenhouse gases emissions for electricity plants, EPA argues that the US energy sector is an answer for only 3 percent of global emissions, and as a result it is not a “significant” that thess has. This is the focus that is found as the focal, which. Regulation a stationary emission source. While the 3 percent figure is objectively precise, experts say that the argument is misleading, especially since the electricity sector is the answer for approximately a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions within the country.

“You are dealing with something that has many, many sources, and you cannot simply throw your hands and say: ‘Well, this will not achieve anything,” said David Bookbinder, director of law and policy of the environmental integrity project, a non -profit organization founded by former EPA lawyers.

If the United States’s energy industry is based more on coal and natural gas in relation to renewable energies, such as Republicans seem to wait, these emissions could continue to be thirdly high, especially as the demand for power grows. What is even safer is that costs will continue to rise. The latest government inflation data shows that consumer electricity prices are already increasing much more dramatically than the general consumer prices. In this environment, technology companies that build massive data centers to feed cloud computing and AI have fought for adequate and cheap electricity. In fact, so many energy consumption facilities are dollars of bees that legislators in Virginia, which are in the heart of the data center belt, have promulgated Legislet to prevent them from exceeding the grid.

Since public service companies cannot meet the energy needs of technology players such as Microsoft, Google and Amazon Web Services, some of these companies have begun to directly hire renewable energy developers and surprising agreements with nuclear energy plans operators. A thesis partner of the Commercial Group recently asked the Senate to review the pending law license, so it restores some of the clean energy provisions of the inflation reduction law, saying that the United States needs “affordable and reliable power” for the analysts of the twins. “

“The current administration is choosing the winners and losers of technology and is doing compensation,” Orvis said. “And the compensation they want to do is: to get rid of the fiscal incentives of clean energy that are promoting all this new clean electricity to the network, which exerts a downward pressure on prices and will reduce people’s rates.”

Orvis added that the highest electricity costs increase the cost of doing business for manufacturers, including those of the AI ​​avant -garde, which makes it more difficult to compete with China.

“We are at a fundamental crossroads,” said Orvis. “We can bow and support the internal growth of these industries creating a political environment with certainty, incentives and support. Or we can do what the current administration is trying to do, and withdraw all those things and allow China to step on.”