Judge Delays Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Jury Selection, Concerned About ‘Cold Feet’

On Friday the jury selection was delayed for the successful trial for the organized crime of Sean combs, about the concerns that some jurors could obtain “cold feet” before the start of the high profile case.

Judge Arun Subramanian, who supervises the case, expressed concern that if jurors were selected before the weekend, they could worry and leave the panel before the trial begins on Monday. The decision occurred after a possible jury sent an email to the court asking to be out of the panel for “personal well -being,” said the defense.

Twelve jurors and six substitutes will be selected and sworn on Monday at the Federal District Court in Manhattan, before opening statements in the case.

The jury will have the task of deciding whether the music tycoon was a “swinger” with unorthodox sexual inclinations, or a predator who used his power to abuse victims in the encounters with drug attacks. If he is guilty, Mr. Combs, who was once a round celebration figure in the music industry, could the rest of his life in prison.

The jury members will be anonymous, which means that their names will not be revealed in a public court. They will not be kidnapped, in principle, so it depends on them to protect the tremors from the coverage of the media and other talks about the case.

Approximately three days, the dishes of the New Yorkers touch the witness within the courtroom, where they asked to describe in detail what they had seen and heard about the case against the artist and the executive, which has been last year and a half half.

Mr. Combs, who has vehemently denied the allegations, watched intently as the potential jurors gathered What they had learned on the internet and this Speculative Cattersersers, In Speculative Catters, In Speculative and Between, In Speculative and Between, In Speculative and Between, In Speculative and Between’s Between. Case, in a satirical song by a Russian comedian.

When questioning some members of the potential jury, Judge Subramanian asked about his own activity on social networks.

“Do you remember having perhaps withdrawn a meme about Mr. Combs or a joke about Mr. Combs?” The judge asked a man.

“Most likely,” he replied.

Many of the candidates insisted that they could put aside any previous exhibition to the case to make a decision only about what is presented in the trial.

“I’m old enough to have heard many stories before trial and then, when the evidence really presents themselves, things are, you know, the truth comes out,” said a possible jury.

Transferred every day from a jail in the Sunset Park neighborhood in Brooklyn, Mr. Combs has used a crew neck, pants and shoes without lace every day approved by the judge.

Prosecutors have accused Mr. combs to use violence and financial manipulation for women in sexual marathons fueled by drugs over a period of years. His lawyers have argued that the meetings, sometimes known as “monsters”, were completely agreed, accusing the government of invading Mr. combs private life with long -term brides.

His gray hair and his beard cut, the defendant nodded at the times when the members of the potential jury told stories about his past, and he broke a smile when a candidate said that the “American idol” program saw religious.

A couple of times, Mr. Combs showed apparent disability shaking his head or letting a sigh escape, when the jury candidates revealed that they had seen images of him by assaulting his ex -girlfriend, Casandra Ventura, in an incident in the center of the case of the sexual trap of the government.

Many of the possible members of the jury said they had seen the parts of the footage, which was published by CNN last year. It shows Mr. combs, using only a towel, striking, kicking and dragging Mrs. Ventura, the Government’s star witness in the case, a singer known as Cassie, near an elevators bank of the hotel.

A possible jury said in a questionnaire used to evaluate those who could be selected for the panel that the video “gives the appearance of an angry and hostile person who is entitled.” Another wrote that the assault could be condemnatory evidence, “he thought he pointed out that” of course, everyone is presumed innocent until it is proven guilty. ” (It was apologized by the jury pool).

Familiarity with the footage was not necessarily disqualifying. Judge Subramanian asked the possible jurors who had seen the video if he would cloud his trial. Did it lead them to form an opinion about the guilt or innocence of Mr. Combs?

“No, it didn’t lead me to form an opinion,” replied a woman who had seen images of the assault on the news of the event. “Basically I was only seeing it and was in the abchea or shocked tasks.”

If a jury candidate betrayed a bias, towards Mr. Combs or the prosecution, or seemed insecure if they could be impartial, the judge hit them from the pool.

A woman apologized after she acknowledged that the daily conversations about the case among coworkers may have influenced her vision of Mr. combs. “My prejudice is that I have two daughters,” he said. “So, when we argued, I think of my children.”

Another woman was withdrawn after noticing in her questionnaire that Mr. combs had “a lot of money to use his discretion” and could “buy her jail out.”

The judge also asked the potential jury if they had experiences with the application of the law that could preach them against the Prosecutor’s Office. How about sexual assault or domestic abuse?

Several discussed the personal stories of sexual abuse, which were not disqualified as lungs as the candidates agree that the experiments would not color their approach to the case.

Some people were cut for health conditions, financial difficulties or problems to understand English. A man admitted that it would be difficult to refrain from smoking marijuana about what is expected to be an eight -week trial. Another man said he worked at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, the jail in what Mr. Comink is a hero.

And a woman detailed her apprehension around the discussion of sexual situations, which is expected to be abundant in a case that revolves around alleged sex trafficking that involves male prostitutes. “I could pass out or faint,” he told the judge.

As part of the detection process, a list of people who could mention in the trial were given to the jury group, see if someone had conflicts. Some on the list were people who know each other for having accused Mr. Combs or misconduct. There were several important celebrities, which caused online speculation about how these figures could arise in the case.

The members of the jury elected on Monday will come from a list of 43 candidates who passed the initial detection stage.

In recent days, Mr. Comong’s defense team has been overcome to include eight lawyers. The recent additions include Brian Steel, who amounted to national prominence by defending rapper Young Thug in an extensive case of excessive in Atlanta, and Nicole Westmoreland, who represented another accused in that case. The government has six prosecutors in your team.

The government team became the focus of a dramatic exchange on Tuesday in the judge’s dress room, where Judge Subramanian summoned another lawyer who has represented Mr. Combs, Mark Geragos, thought he is not an official member of the defense team.

According to a transcription of the conversation in the dress room, Judge Subramanian admonished Mr. Geragos for a comment he made in a podcast that co-elbitrione with Harvey Levin, a founder of TMZ. Duration An discussion about the case in the podcast, Mr. Geragos described the Prosecutor’s Office as a “package of six white women.”

“I think this is outrageous and this would not be tolerated in any court of any lawyer anywhere in the whole country,” said Judge Subramanian. “And I’m going to be looking, and I’m going to be listening. Are you okay? You have one more listener for your podcast.”

Mr. Geragos did not agree that his comment was inappropriate, and he played the judge that Mr. Combs is a black man who “feels that he is being attacked” by the Prosecutor’s Office. (The Government has denied that Mr. combs is being prosecuted for its race).

But Mr. Geragos did not oppose the judge to tune his program.

“While you subscribe, I’m in favor,” he said.